Hickey v. Smith

1 Ark. 456
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 15, 1846·Published

Opinion

Oldham J.,

delivered the opinion of the court*

It is contended by the plaintiffs in error, that the circuit court erred in overruling the motion to dismiss -the suit for want of a bond for costs. The record failing to set out any evidence whatever in support of the motion, the presumption is in favor of the-decision of the court below. Montgomery vs. Carpenter, 5 Ark. R. 264. Cox & Kelly vs. Garvin, decided at this term, ante.

The judgment, however, is rendered against all the defendants,, without any service of notice upon James Hickey, or voluntary appearance by him-.- In this there is error,- for which we reverse' the judgment, and remánd the cause to be proceeded in according; to law*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickey v. Smith, 1 Ark. 456 (Ark. 1846).

1 Ark. 456 (Hickey v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.