Hickey v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Hickey v. Ryan

36 A. 1132, 19 R.I. 399, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 103

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 23, 1896·No. Exceptions, c., No. 2113.·Published

Opinion

We find no error in the ruling of the court below charging the garnishee. The bill of exceptions shows that the garnishee, who claims under an assignment of wages made to him by the defendant, returned to the defendant about half the wages earned by him each week. This was clearly fraudulent as against other creditors.

Exceptions overruled, and case remitted to the District Court for the Tenth Judicial District.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We find no error in the ruling of the court below charging the garnishee. The bill of exceptions shows that the garnishee, who claims under an assignment of wages made to him by the defendant, returned to the defendant about half the wages earned by him each week. This was clearly fraudulent as against other creditors.

Exceptions overruled, and case remitted to the District Court for the Tenth Judicial District.

Hickey v. Ryan, 36 A. 1132, 19 R.I. 399, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 103 (R.I. 1896).

Pincite

36 A. 1132 (Hickey v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.