Hickey v. New York City Railway Co.

95 N.Y.S. 1135
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1135 (Hickey v. New York City Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickey v. New York City Railway Co., 95 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By the plaintiff’s own testimony he was so clearly guilty of contributory negligence that it is impossible to conceive how the jury could determine in his favor, except as the result of prejudice. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickey-v-new-york-city-railway-co-nyappterm-1905.