Hickey v. First Nat. Bank of Lyndhurst
158 A. 377, 110 N.J. Eq. 52, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 774
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the memorandum filed by Vice-Chancellor' Bigelow.
*54 ■For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hickey v. First Nat. Bank of Lyndhurst, 158 A. 377, 110 N.J. Eq. 52, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 774 (N.J. 1932).
158 A. 377 (Hickey v. First Nat. Bank of Lyndhurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Applied Logic Corporation, Bankrupt. New Jersey National Bank v. Daniel Gutterman, as Trustee of Applied Logic Corporation, Bankrupt
576 F.2d 952 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Borough of Totowa v. American Surety Co. of New York
188 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1963)