Hickey v. Dougherty

337 So. 2d 992

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1976·No. No. 76-204·Published

Opinion

ORDERED that appellant’s May 10, 1976 Petition for Rehearing is hereby denied, and further,

ORDERED that the following question passed upon in this court’s opinion filed April 30, 1976, is certified to the Supreme Court of Florida as a question of great public interest, to wit:

“Whether § 1[.01](14) or § 743.07, Florida Statutes, purport to and/or expressly or impliedly repeal or amend the provisions of §§ 768.16-768.27, Florida Statutes, so as to change the definition of the word ‘minor’ contained in the latter statutes to mean ‘any unmarried child under the age of twenty-one years of age.’ ”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDERED that appellant’s May 10, 1976 Petition for Rehearing is hereby denied, and further,

ORDERED that the following question passed upon in this court’s opinion filed April 30, 1976, is certified to the Supreme Court of Florida as a question of great public interest, to wit:

“Whether § 1[.01](14) or § 743.07, Florida Statutes, purport to and/or expressly or impliedly repeal or amend the provisions of §§ 768.16-768.27, Florida Statutes, so as to change the definition of the word ‘minor’ contained in the latter statutes to mean ‘any unmarried child under the age of twenty-one years of age.’ ”

Hickey v. Dougherty, 337 So. 2d 992 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

337 So. 2d 992 (Hickey v. Dougherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.