Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.

149 A.3d 498, 323 Conn. 914, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 301

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 27, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Alan Jay Black, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 162 Conn. App. 505, 133 A.3d 489 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly remand the matter to the habeas court for a new hearing rather than engaging in plenary review of the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984) ?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alan Jay Black, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 162 Conn. App. 505, 133 A.3d 489 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly remand the matter to the habeas court for a new hearing rather than engaging in plenary review of the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984) ?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr., 149 A.3d 498, 323 Conn. 914, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 301 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

149 A.3d 498 (Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related