Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.

149 A.3d 498, 323 Conn. 914, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 301
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 27, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 A.3d 498 (Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr., 149 A.3d 498, 323 Conn. 914, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 301 (Colo. 2016).

Opinion

Alan Jay Black, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The respondent's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 162 Conn. App. 505, 133 A.3d 489 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly remand the matter to the habeas court for a new hearing rather than engaging in plenary review of the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984) ?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hickey v. Comm'r of Corr.
188 A.3d 715 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.3d 498, 323 Conn. 914, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickey-v-commr-of-corr-conn-2016.