Hickey v. Brown Company

45 A.2d 217, 94 N.H. 21, 1946 N.H. LEXIS 198
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided January 2, 1946·No. No. 3571.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Johnston, J.

One cannot recover compensation for an injury in

so far as it is caused by one’s own neglect to have remedial care. The injury to this-extent does not arise out of and in the course of the workman’s employment. The proximate cause is the plaintiff’s own failure to use reasonable care to overcome his disability. “The chargeable disability is only that resulting from accident incurred in employment, and not that caused by the workman’s carelessness preventing or delaying recovery from the accident.” Neault v. Company, 86 N. H. 231, 232. See Perreault v. Company, 87 N. H. 306; Vállee v. Company, 89 N. H. 285; 105 A. L. R 1470n.

The questions of what injury the plaintiff would have suffered if he had not taken the medical treatments and whether such omission would have been lack of due care are moot. Only actual injuries, past, present and future, are compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Judgment for $31.50.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hickey v. Brown Company, 45 A.2d 217, 94 N.H. 21, 1946 N.H. LEXIS 198 (N.H. 1946).

45 A.2d 217 (Hickey v. Brown Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davidson Rubber Co. v. Matherson
281 A.2d 50 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1971)