Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman
This text of 85 P. 870 (Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendants appealed to this court from a judgment, and from an order of the district court denying them a new trial.
Appellants’ brief does not contain any specification of errors relied upon, as required by Rule X of the Rules of this court (30 Mont, xxxviii, 82 Pac. ix). Upon the authority of the following eases the judgment and order are affirmed: (Cole v. Ryan, 24 Mont. 122, 60 Pac. 991; Rehberg v. Greiser, 24 Mont. 487, 62 Pac. 820; Casey v. Thieviege, 27 Mont. 516, 71 Pac. 755; Larkin v. Butte & Boston C. M. Co., 28 Mont. 41, 72 Pac. 304.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 P. 870, 34 Mont. 106, 1906 Mont. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickey-co-v-kaufman-mont-1906.