Home/California Supreme Court/Hickey Brothers Company v. Kingsbury

Hickey Brothers Company v. Kingsbury

274 P. 62, 206 Cal. 794, 1928 Cal. LEXIS 467
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 31, 1928
DocketDocket No. S.F. 12729.
StatusPublished

This text of 274 P. 62 (Hickey Brothers Company v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickey Brothers Company v. Kingsbury, 274 P. 62, 206 Cal. 794, 1928 Cal. LEXIS 467 (Cal. 1928).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] For similar reasons and upon similar grounds as stated in the case of Charles M. Workman v. W.S. Kingsbury,Surveyor-General of the State of California, etc., S.F. No. 12728, ante, p. 148 [273 P. 797], this day filed, the application for the writ is denied and the petition is dismissed.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boone v. Kingsbury
273 P. 797 (California Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 P. 62, 206 Cal. 794, 1928 Cal. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickey-brothers-company-v-kingsbury-cal-1928.