Hickey Bros. v. Kingsbury

206 Cal. 794
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 31, 1928
DocketS. F. No. 12729
StatusPublished

This text of 206 Cal. 794 (Hickey Bros. v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hickey Bros. v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 794 (Cal. 1928).

Opinion

THE COURT.

For similar reasons and upon similar grounds as stated in the case of Charles M. Workman v. W. S. Kingsbury, Surveyor-General of the State of California, etc., S. F. No. 12728, ante, p. 148 [273 Pac. 797], this day filed, the application for the writ is denied and the petition is dismissed.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boone v. Kingsbury
273 P. 797 (California Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 Cal. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hickey-bros-v-kingsbury-cal-1928.