Hicken v. Delaware Department of Corrections
This text of Hicken v. Delaware Department of Corrections (Hicken v. Delaware Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MATTHEW HICKEN, § § No. 498, 2017 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. N17M-05-331 DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF § CORRECTIONS, § § Respondent Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: February 14, 2018 Decided: February 15, 2018 ORDER This 15th day of February 2018, it appears to the Court that the Clerk issued a
notice to show cause directing the appellant to show cause why the above-captioned
appeal should not be dismissed for the appellant’s failure to file a motion to proceed
in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee associated with the appeal. The appellant
has not responded to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period.
Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hicken v. Delaware Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hicken-v-delaware-department-of-corrections-del-2018.