Hichins v. Lyon

35 Ill. 150
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 35 Ill. 150 (Hichins v. Lyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hichins v. Lyon, 35 Ill. 150 (Ill. 1864).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Beckwith

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A judgment should not be rendered in an attachment suit for a greater sum than is claimed by the affidavit where there is no appearance by the defendant or personal service of the writ (12 Ill. 198), nor should it exceed the ad damnum of the plaintiffs’ declaration. Breese, 174; 3 Scam. 347; 2 Gilm. 375; 19 Ill. 46; 22 id. 287; 24 id. 197; 27 id. 293.

We are of the opinion that a return of non est inventáis is not necessary to authorize the rendition of a judgment under the provisions of the act of February 12, 1857. Laws of 1857, p. 51.

jReversed and rema/nded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krumser v. Meeker-Magner Co.
220 Ill. App. 376 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)
Taylor v. Richman
87 Ill. App. 419 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Palmer v. Riddle
54 N.E. 227 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.
39 N.E. 443 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Safford v. Charles
7 N.E. 730 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
First National Bank v. Hughes
10 Mo. App. 7 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1881)
Forsyth v. Warren
62 Ill. 68 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ill. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hichins-v-lyon-ill-1864.