Hichins v. Lyon

35 Ill. 150
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1864·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Beckwith

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A judgment should not be rendered in an attachment suit for a greater sum than is claimed by the affidavit where there is no appearance by the defendant or personal service of the writ (12 Ill. 198), nor should it exceed the ad damnum of the plaintiffs’ declaration. Breese, 174; 3 Scam. 347; 2 Gilm. 375; 19 Ill. 46; 22 id. 287; 24 id. 197; 27 id. 293.

We are of the opinion that a return of non est inventáis is not necessary to authorize the rendition of a judgment under the provisions of the act of February 12, 1857. Laws of 1857, p. 51.

jReversed and rema/nded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hichins v. Lyon, 35 Ill. 150 (Ill. 1864).

35 Ill. 150 (Hichins v. Lyon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krumser v. Meeker-Magner Co.
220 Ill. App. 376 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)
Taylor v. Richman
87 Ill. App. 419 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Palmer v. Riddle
54 N.E. 227 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.
39 N.E. 443 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Safford v. Charles
7 N.E. 730 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
First National Bank v. Hughes
10 Mo. App. 7 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1881)
Forsyth v. Warren
62 Ill. 68 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1871)