Hibler v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Hibler v. Smith

119 P. 41, 20 Idaho 590, 1911 Ida. LEXIS 120

DecidedNovember 14, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 119 P. 41 (Hibler v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hibler v. Smith, 119 P. 41, 20 Idaho 590, 1911 Ida. LEXIS 120 (Idaho 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

AILSHIE, J.

In this ease tbe plaintiffs sued on foui causes of action. Defendants admitted tbe first cause a-action, and made a tender into court of tbe amount due.

It is claimed on this appeal that tbe evidence is not sufficient to support tbe verdict and judgment on tbe other three causes of action. Tbe evidence is sufficient to support tbe judgment as to all but the fourth cause of action, and as to that there is a total lack of material or substantial evidence to support the claim there alleged.

Tbe judgment will be affirmed as to tbe first three causes of action and is hereby reversed as to tbe fourth cause of action, and tbe case is hereby remanded with direction to grant a new trial on tbe fourth cause of action. Costs of appeal will be equally divided between appellants and respondents.

Stewart, C. J., and Sullivan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AILSHIE, J.

In this ease tbe plaintiffs sued on foui causes of action. Defendants admitted tbe first cause a-action, and made a tender into court of tbe amount due.

It is claimed on this appeal that tbe evidence is not sufficient to support tbe verdict and judgment on tbe other three causes of action. Tbe evidence is sufficient to support tbe judgment as to all but the fourth cause of action, and as to that there is a total lack of material or substantial evidence to support the claim there alleged.

Tbe judgment will be affirmed as to tbe first three causes of action and is hereby reversed as to tbe fourth cause of action, and tbe case is hereby remanded with direction to grant a new trial on tbe fourth cause of action. Costs of appeal will be equally divided between appellants and respondents.

Stewart, C. J., and Sullivan, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 P. 41, 20 Idaho 590, 1911 Ida. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hibler-v-smith-idaho-1911.