Hibernia National Bank v. Carey

857 So. 2d 465, 2003 La. LEXIS 3145, 2003 WL 22519884
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 31, 2003
DocketNo. 2003-OC-2004
StatusPublished

This text of 857 So. 2d 465 (Hibernia National Bank v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hibernia National Bank v. Carey, 857 So. 2d 465, 2003 La. LEXIS 3145, 2003 WL 22519884 (La. 2003).

Opinion

In re Blossman Group; Blossman, Richard S.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 377-829; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-C-671.

Granted. Under the facts of this case, the trial court had authority under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal to extend the deadline for filing beyond the thirty-day limit. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal refusing to consider the application is set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnard v. Barnard
675 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 So. 2d 465, 2003 La. LEXIS 3145, 2003 WL 22519884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hibernia-national-bank-v-carey-la-2003.