Hibernia National Bank v. Carey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hibernia National Bank v. Carey

857 So. 2d 465, 2003 La. LEXIS 3145, 2003 WL 22519884

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 31, 2003·No. No. 2003-OC-2004·Published

Opinion

In re Blossman Group; Blossman, Richard S.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 377-829; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-C-671.

Granted. Under the facts of this case, the trial court had authority under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal to extend the deadline for filing beyond the thirty-day limit. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal refusing to consider the application is set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Blossman Group; Blossman, Richard S.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 377-829; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-C-671.

Granted. Under the facts of this case, the trial court had authority under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal to extend the deadline for filing beyond the thirty-day limit. See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734. Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal refusing to consider the application is set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

Hibernia National Bank v. Carey, 857 So. 2d 465, 2003 La. LEXIS 3145, 2003 WL 22519884 (La. 2003).

Pincite

857 So. 2d 465 (Hibernia National Bank v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related