Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission

616 So. 2d 194, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510, 1993 WL 107054
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1710
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 616 So. 2d 194 (Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission, 616 So. 2d 194, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510, 1993 WL 107054 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hibbott’s application for mandamus was properly denied because he did not show a clear legal right to the advanceable control release date he sought, or that the Florida Parole Commission had a clear legal duty to grant it. See King v. Florida Parole Commission, 614 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON and MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. State
616 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 194, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510, 1993 WL 107054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hibbott-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1993.