Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission
616 So. 2d 194, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510, 1993 WL 107054
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1993·No. No. 92-1710·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Hibbott’s application for mandamus was properly denied because he did not show a clear legal right to the advanceable control release date he sought, or that the Florida Parole Commission had a clear legal duty to grant it. See King v. Florida Parole Commission, 614 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission, 616 So. 2d 194, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4510, 1993 WL 107054 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 194 (Hibbott v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turner v. State
616 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)