Hibbing v. Hyde

50 Cal. 206, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 125
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4215·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the defendant maliciously, and without probable cause, charged the plaintiff, before a justice of the peace, with having committed the crime of malicious mischief. Plaintiff also alleges that he was tried and found guilty of the crime charged; and this averment he succeeded in proving at the trial of the present action.

In an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal charge, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution, alleged to have been malicious, has terminated by his acquittal. (Rhodes v. Silvers, 1 Harr. 127; 2 Greenl. Evidence, 252; 1 Hill on Torts, 416; Hilliard, Remedies for Torts, 385.)

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hibbing v. Hyde, 50 Cal. 206, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 125 (Cal. 1875).

50 Cal. 206 (Hibbing v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dowdell v. Carpy
61 P. 948 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Carpenter v. Nutter
59 P. 301 (California Supreme Court, 1899)