Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hibben v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Hibben v. City of Fort Lauderdale

222 So. 2d 245, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1969
DocketNo. 2345
StatusPublished

This text of 222 So. 2d 245 (Hibben v. City of Fort Lauderdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hibben v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 222 So. 2d 245, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion the trial court correctly concluded that under the facts alleged in the amended complaint, the contract upon which the plaintiff sought to recover was within the statute of frauds, Section 725.01, F.S.1967, F.S.A. We affirm the judgment appealed from on the authority of Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc., Fla.1963, 190 So.2d 777; Manas v. Southern Diversified Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 480; Swisher v. Conrad, 1919, 76 Fla. 644, 80 So. 564; Yates v. Ball, 1937, 132 Fla. 132, 181 So. 341; and Jenkins v. King, 1946, 224 Ind. 164, 65 N.E.2d 121, 163 A.L.R. 397.

Affirmed.

CROSS, REED and OWEN, TJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.
190 So. 2d 777 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Yates v. Ball
181 So. 341 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Jenkins v. King
65 N.E.2d 121 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1946)
Swisher v. Conrad
80 So. 564 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Manas v. Southern Diversified Industries, Inc.
193 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 So. 2d 245, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hibben-v-city-of-fort-lauderdale-fladistctapp-1969.