Hibbard v. McGraw
This text of 905 So. 2d 120 (Hibbard v. McGraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Faith Carr HIBBARD, et al., Petitioners,
v.
Michael McGRAW, et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Stephen c. Bullock of Brannon, Brown, Haley, Robinson and Bullock, P.A., Lake City, Florida, for Petitioner.
*121 Francis J. Milon of Harris Brown, P.A., Jacksonville, Florida, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Hibbard v. McGraw, 862 So.2d 816 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), a decision that expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Norman v. Farrow, 832 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), which was recently approved by this Court in Norman v. Farrow, 880 So.2d 557 (Fla. 2004). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Norman.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
905 So. 2d 120, 2005 WL 1404449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hibbard-v-mcgraw-fla-2005.