Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co.

Supreme Court

Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co.

267 U.S. 586, 45 S. Ct. 463

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 23, 1925

DocketNo. 650

StatusPublished

This text of 267 U.S. 586 (Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co., 267 U.S. 586, 45 S. Ct. 463 (1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 [587]*587U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. J. C. Martin for defendant in error in support of the motion to dismiss or affirm. Messrs J. Crawford Biggs, John H. Frantz and R. M. McConnell for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 [587]*587U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. J. C. Martin for defendant in error in support of the motion to dismiss or affirm. Messrs J. Crawford Biggs, John H. Frantz and R. M. McConnell for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 U.S. 586, 45 S. Ct. 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiawassee-river-power-co-v-carolina-tennessee-power-co-scotus-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack