Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co.

267 U.S. 586, 45 S. Ct. 463
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 23, 1925·No. No. 650·Published

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 [587]*587U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Mr. J. C. Martin for defendant in error in support of the motion to dismiss or affirm. Messrs J. Crawford Biggs, John H. Frantz and R. M. McConnell for plaintiff in error in opposition to the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co., 267 U.S. 586, 45 S. Ct. 463 (1925).

267 U.S. 586 (Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina Tennessee Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)