Home/Supreme Court of Oklahoma/HIATT v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND

HIATT v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND

2015 OK 77
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 16, 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 OK 77 (HIATT v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HIATT v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND, 2015 OK 77 (Okla. 2015).

Opinion

OSCN Found Document:HIATT v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND
  1. Home
  2. Courts
  3. Court Dockets
  4. Legal Research
  5. Calendar
  6. Help
  1. Previous Case
  2. Top Of Index
  3. This Point in Index
  4. Citationize
  5. Next Case
  6. Print Only

HIATT v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND
2015 OK 77
Case Number: 112792
Decided: 11/16/2015
As Corrected: November 17, 2015
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Cite as: 2015 OK 77, __ P.3d __

NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

RHONDA HIATT, Petitioner,
v.
MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND and THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT, Respondents.

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

¶1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S. Ct. Rule 1.201.

¶2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decision in Ball v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2015 OK 64, ___P.3d___ disposes of the issues in this case.

¶3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Court of Civil Appeals opinion in this case is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the Workers' Compensation Court of Existing Claims for further proceedings.

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 16TH day of November, 2015.

/S/VICE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶4 Combs, V.C.J., Kauger, Watt, Winchester, Edmondson, Taylor, Gurich, JJ., concur.

¶5 Reif, C.J., Colbert, J., dissent.

Reif, C.J., dissenting,

I dissent for the same reasons stated in my dissent in the Ball case.

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
None Found.
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 2015 OK 64, BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDCited

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND
2015 OK 64 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 OK 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiatt-v-multiple-injury-trust-fund-okla-2015.