Hiatt v. Goblt
This text of 18 Ind. 494 (Hiatt v. Goblt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this suit, to foreclose a mortgage, copies of the mortgage and notes were not made parts of the complaint, and thus identified, either by being copied into the complaint, or by reference in the complaint to copies or originals filed with it, although a mortgage and notes were filed' with the complaint. Nor was a copy of either one of them filed, or referred to in the complaint. The complaint was bad.
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial, with leave to amend. See 2 G. & H. p. 375.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ind. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiatt-v-goblt-ind-1862.