Hiatt v. Barker

194 So. 2d 495, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1411
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 30, 1967
DocketNo. 44536
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 194 So. 2d 495 (Hiatt v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hiatt v. Barker, 194 So. 2d 495, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1411 (Mich. 1967).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

RODGERS, Justice.

A motion to dismiss an appeal from a consent decree entered in the Chancery Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, has been filed and considered by this Court. The consent decree involves the custody of minor children, and the chancellor permitted an appeal with supersedeas.

We are of the opinion, and so hold, that an appeal cannot be taken from a consent decree or judgment of a trial court by one of the parties to the consent decree or judgment. Miss. Code Ann. § 1147 (1956); Guthrie v. Guthrie, 226 Miss. 190, 84 So.2d 158 (1955); Hunter v. Stanford, 198 Miss. 299, 22 So.2d 166 (1945).

The motion is therefore sustained, and the appeal to this Court from the consent decree is dismissed without prejudice to appropriate proceedings in the trial court to determine the factual issue with reference to the allegations that the appellant did not consent to the decree, and for such further proceedings as may be necessary to determine the custody of the children involved.

Appeal dismissed.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rushing v. Rushing
724 So. 2d 911 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1998)
Wray v. Langston
380 So. 2d 1262 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 2d 495, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiatt-v-barker-miss-1967.