Hiang v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hiang v. State

146 S.W.3d 894, 356 Ark. 120, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 86

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 12, 2004

DocketCR 04-74

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.W.3d 894 (Hiang v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiang v. State, 146 S.W.3d 894, 356 Ark. 120, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 86 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants Mary Hiang and Consuella Terrell, by and through their attorney, Gregory E. Bryant, have filed a motion for rule on clerk. Mr. Bryant admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellants Mary Hiang and Consuella Terrell, by and through their attorney, Gregory E. Bryant, have filed a motion for rule on clerk. Mr. Bryant admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.W.3d 894, 356 Ark. 120, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiang-v-state-ark-2004.