Hiamilakis v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hiamilakis v. Jackson

267 A.D.2d 182, 700 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13402

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 182 (Hiamilakis v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiamilakis v. Jackson, 267 A.D.2d 182, 700 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Motor Vehicles Commissioner dated February 3, 1999, finding petitioner in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180 (d), unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered June 30, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s findings that it was petitioner, and not his brother, who exceeded the speed limit are supported by substantial evidence. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s credibility findings (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). To the extent petitioner seeks additional relief pertaining to unrelated summonses, his requests are not properly before this Court. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Motor Vehicles Commissioner dated February 3, 1999, finding petitioner in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180 (d), unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [William McCooe, J.], entered June 30, 1999) dismissed, without costs.

Respondent’s findings that it was petitioner, and not his brother, who exceeded the speed limit are supported by substantial evidence. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s credibility findings (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). To the extent petitioner seeks additional relief pertaining to unrelated summonses, his requests are not properly before this Court. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 182, 700 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiamilakis-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack