Hialeah-Miami Springs Bank v. Saca
171 So. 2d 401
This text of 171 So. 2d 401 (Hialeah-Miami Springs Bank v. Saca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hialeah-Miami Springs Bank v. Saca, 171 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
Affirmed upon authority of Hutchinson Shoe Co. v. Turner, 100 Fla. 1120, 130 So. 623; and Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Magwood, 107 Fla. 208, 145 So. 67, 68.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Magwood
145 So. 67 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Hutchinson Shoe Co. v. Turner
130 So. 623 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 So. 2d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hialeah-miami-springs-bank-v-saca-fladistctapp-1965.