HGI Associates, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

265 F. App'x 861

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 19, 2008·No. No. 06-16347·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendants summary judgment. The plaintiff contends that the district court erred:

1) in holding that res judicata barred its claim for punitive damages; and

2) in holding that collateral estoppel barred its claim for compensatory or punitive damages.

After hearing oral argument, we conclude that the court committed no error in granting the defendants summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendants summary judgment. The plaintiff contends that the district court erred:

1) in holding that res judicata barred its claim for punitive damages; and

2) in holding that collateral estoppel barred its claim for compensatory or punitive damages.

After hearing oral argument, we conclude that the court committed no error in granting the defendants summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

HGI Associates, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 265 F. App'x 861 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

265 F. App'x 861 (HGI Associates, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.