H.F. v. State

556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1990 WL 15383
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1990
DocketNo. 89-152
StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 543 (H.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H.F. v. State, 556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1990 WL 15383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, H.F., appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary, grand theft, and [544]*544criminal mischief on the ground the evidence was legally insufficient to present a prima facie case. Based upon the State’s confession of error and our own independent review of this case, we reverse and remand for discharge of appellant. Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), affirmed, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); M.F. v. State, 549 So.2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); E.L.S. v. State, 547 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tibbs v. Florida
457 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Jaramillo v. State
417 So. 2d 257 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
E.L.S. v. State
547 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
M.F. v. State
549 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1990 WL 15383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hf-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.