H.F. v. State
This text of 556 So. 2d 543 (H.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Appellant, H.F., appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary, grand theft, and [544]*544criminal mischief on the ground the evidence was legally insufficient to present a prima facie case. Based upon the State’s confession of error and our own independent review of this case, we reverse and remand for discharge of appellant. Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), affirmed, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); M.F. v. State, 549 So.2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); E.L.S. v. State, 547 So.2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 So. 2d 543, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 911, 1990 WL 15383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hf-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.