Heywood v. Berkeley Land & Town Improvement Ass'n

12 P. 232, 71 Cal. 349, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heywood v. Berkeley Land & Town Improvement Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Cal. Unrep. 658
California Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1886·No. No. 8296·Published

Opinion

The Court.

The court below found, “the leased premises in the complaint described have, since the first day of April, 1880, been used in good faith continuously for the usual and ordinary business of a ferry to and from the city and county of San Francisco, and for no period [351]*351since the first day of April, 1880, were the leased premises not used for the business or the purpose of a ferry”; and as conclusion of law the court found that the said lease was not and is not forfeited; that the defendants do not unlawfully withhold or detain the said leased premises from the plaintiff.

We are of opinion that the finding of fact is justified by the evidence, and that no forfeiture was incurred.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heywood v. Berkeley Land & Town Improvement Ass'n, 12 P. 232, 71 Cal. 349, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 590 (Cal. 1886).

12 P. 232 (Heywood v. Berkeley Land & Town Improvement Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.