Heyse v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

225 So. 2d 476, 254 La. 637, 1969 La. LEXIS 3393
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedAugust 22, 1969
DocketNo. 50018
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 So. 2d 476 (Heyse v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heyse v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 225 So. 2d 476, 254 La. 637, 1969 La. LEXIS 3393 (La. 1969).

Opinion

In re: Billy Heyse, for and on behalf of Rufus Wayne Heyse applying for writs of review and certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Lewis S. Doherty, III, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of November, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heyse v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
229 So. 2d 724 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 So. 2d 476, 254 La. 637, 1969 La. LEXIS 3393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heyse-v-fidelity-casualty-co-la-1969.