Home/U.S. Customs Court/Heymes v. United States

Heymes v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 394
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 30, 1961
DocketNo. 65359; protests 262307-K, 262308-K, and 269368-K (Laredo)
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 394 (Heymes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heymes v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 394 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

[395]*395Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. The Best Foods, Inc. (47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Best Foods, Inc.
47 C.C.P.A. 163 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heymes-v-united-states-cusc-1961.