Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Heymann v. Morrison

Heymann v. Morrison

110 A.D.2d 819, 488 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48721
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 22, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.D.2d 819 (Heymann v. Morrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heymann v. Morrison, 110 A.D.2d 819, 488 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

It cannot be said that the verdict was not based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence which presented a sharp issue of fact. It was within the province of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses, and to refuse to credit the testimony of plaintiffs (see, Taype v City of New York, 82 AD2d 648, 650-651, lv denied 55 NY2d 608; cf. Lorenzo v Lubchansky, 75 AD2d 865).

We have considered plaintiffs’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Thompson, Bracken, and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lorenzo v. Lubchansky
75 A.D.2d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Taype v. City of New York
82 A.D.2d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.2d 819, 488 N.Y.S.2d 73, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heymann-v-morrison-nyappdiv-1985.