Heymann v. Mascheck

139 So. 82, 18 La. App. 584
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 11, 1932
DocketNo. 14034
StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 82 (Heymann v. Mascheck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heymann v. Mascheck, 139 So. 82, 18 La. App. 584 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on motion to dismiss the appeal. Judgment in the court below was rendered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant obtained an order for a suspensive and devolutive appeal upon furnishing bond as required by law. He thereupon furnished bond in the sum of $200.

On a rule filed in the court below, judgment was rendered dismissing the appeal apparently on the ground that the surety was insufficient. No new appeal bond was furnished in accordance with Act 112 of 1916.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the motion to dismiss the appeal be and it is sustained, and accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

Motion to dismiss appeal sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 82, 18 La. App. 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heymann-v-mascheck-lactapp-1932.