Heymann v. Harnesberger

226 F. 1022, 141 C.C.A. 667, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2269
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 25, 1915·No. No. 2801·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On a careful examination of this record, we conclude that there were no such prejudicial errors in the rulings made- in the District Court as would warrant a reversal. The decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heymann v. Harnesberger, 226 F. 1022, 141 C.C.A. 667, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2269 (5th Cir. 1915).

226 F. 1022 (Heymann v. Harnesberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.