Heyman v. Stopper
91 A. 1069, 86 N.J.L. 357, 1 Gummere 357, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 266
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heyman v. Stopper. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 N.J.L. 128 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Yoorhees in the Supreme Court.
[358]*358For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trencharb, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vrebenburgh, White, Heppenhetmer, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heyman v. Stopper, 91 A. 1069, 86 N.J.L. 357, 1 Gummere 357, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 266 (N.J. 1914).
91 A. 1069 (Heyman v. Stopper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.