Heyers v. Denning

New York Supreme Court

Heyers v. Denning

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 75, 1 Cole. Cas. 70

DecidedApril 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 75 (Heyers v. Denning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heyers v. Denning, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 75, 1 Cole. Cas. 70 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

S~—, appearing in the manner he did, must be considered as a mere stranger, and could not take any rule in the cause. The defendant has neither appeared in person, nor by attorney, nor entered bail; therefore all the proceedings must be set aside. And the court, considering it as improper practice in any attorney to attempt to appear as agent, but not as attorney, add, that S. himself pay the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

S~—, appearing in the manner he did, must be considered as a mere stranger, and could not take any rule in the cause. The defendant has neither appeared in person, nor by attorney, nor entered bail; therefore all the proceedings must be set aside. And the court, considering it as improper practice in any attorney to attempt to appear as agent, but not as attorney, add, that S. himself pay the costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 75, 1 Cole. Cas. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heyers-v-denning-nysupct-1799.