Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Heyer v. Sullivan

Heyer v. Sullivan

103 A. 1052, 88 N.J. Eq. 595, 3 Stock. 595, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 316
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 14, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 103 A. 1052 (Heyer v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heyer v. Sullivan, 103 A. 1052, 88 N.J. Eq. 595, 3 Stock. 595, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 316 (N.J. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the vice-chancellor that the gift was not established. We express no opinion on the other points discussed by him. Let the decree be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. Ellis
111 A.2d 432 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Vanderbach v. Vollinger
64 A.2d 225 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Middlesex County Welfare Board v. Motolinsky
35 A.2d 463 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
In Re Fay
20 A.2d 57 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A. 1052, 88 N.J. Eq. 595, 3 Stock. 595, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heyer-v-sullivan-nj-1918.