Heyer v. Denning

1 Johns. Cas. 103
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1799·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorney on such a notice of appearance, must be considered as a mere stranger, and could talce no rale in the case. It is improper practice in any attorney to attempt to appear as agent, but not as attorney. As. the defendant has not appeared -or put in bail, we grant the motion with costs, to be paid by the attorney who acted for the defendant .(a)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heyer v. Denning, 1 Johns. Cas. 103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

1 Johns. Cas. 103 (Heyer v. Denning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aberdeen Bindery, Inc. v. Eastern States Printing & Publishing Co.
166 Misc. 904 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)