Heyer v. Denning
1 Johns. Cas. 103
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 103 (Heyer v. Denning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heyer v. Denning, 1 Johns. Cas. 103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
The attorney on such a notice of appearance, must be considered as a mere stranger, and could talce no rale in the case. It is improper practice in any attorney to attempt to appear as agent, but not as attorney. As. the defendant has not appeared -or put in bail, we grant the motion with costs, to be paid by the attorney who acted for the defendant .(a)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aberdeen Bindery, Inc. v. Eastern States Printing & Publishing Co.
166 Misc. 904 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heyer-v-denning-nysupct-1799.