Hey v. Town Board of Potter

117 A.D.2d 989, 499 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53227
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The April 1982 vote of the Town Board was not sufficient to repeal the zoning ordinance. Town Law § 265 requires a three-fourths vote of the Town Board in order to repeal a zoning ordinance after protest has been registered, as it was here, by 20% of the affected property owners. Since the Board consists of five members, it was necessary to have four favorable votes in order to repeal the ordinance and thus the 3 to 1 vote, with one member abstaining, was insufficient for repeal. Thus viewed there is no need to address the other issues raised. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Yates County, Purple, J.—art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hey v. Town Board of Potter, 117 A.D.2d 989, 499 N.Y.S.2d 290, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

117 A.D.2d 989 (Hey v. Town Board of Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Patten v. La Porta
148 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)