Hext v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hext v. State

90 S.W. 43, 48 Tex. Crim. 576, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 285

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 25, 1905

DocketNo. 3292.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 S.W. 43 (Hext v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hext v. State, 90 S.W. 43, 48 Tex. Crim. 576, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 285 (Tex. 1905).

Pincite

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for aggravated assault. The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the recognizance is defective. An examination of the recognizance shows that it does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant, as required by article 887, Code Criminal Procedure. May v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 196. The motion is sustained; and the appeal accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON REHEARING.

November 22, 1905.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI