Hext v. State
90 S.W. 43, 48 Tex. Crim. 576, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 285
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 25, 1905·No. No. 3292.·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
This conviction was for aggravated assault. The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the recognizance is defective. An examination of the recognizance shows that it does not state the amount of the punishment assessed against appellant, as required by article 887, Code Criminal Procedure. May v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 196. The motion is sustained; and the appeal accordingly dismissed.
Dismissed.
ON REHEARING.
November 22, 1905.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hext v. State, 90 S.W. 43, 48 Tex. Crim. 576, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 285 (Tex. 1905).
90 S.W. 43 (Hext v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daffan v. State
21 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Peacock v. State
107 S.W. 346 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Barnes v. State
107 S.W. 823 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)