Hext v. Paycom

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided July 1, 1729·Published

Opinion

Upon Reading the Award made by the Arbitrators in this Cause and the Exceptions taken thereto, and what could be sayd by Council on both Sides And upon Debating the matter, This Court Doth think fit And soe Order And Decree That the said Award Does Stand Confirmed by the Decree of this [351]*351Court Provided That the Complainant Edward Hext does give sufficient discharges to the Defendant And that the Costs of this Suite be borne and payd (by the said Joseph Peacom and John Peacom) be such as be taxed by the Master of this Court.

Adjourned

Hen Hargrave Deputy Register in Cane.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hext v. Paycom, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1729).

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 350 (Hext v. Paycom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.