Hexagon Properties v. City of Miami

Florida Circuit Courts

Hexagon Properties v. City of Miami

4 Fla. Supp. 2d 66

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedJuly 26, 1982

DocketCase No. 81-353-AP

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Fla. Supp. 2d 66 (Hexagon Properties v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hexagon Properties v. City of Miami, 4 Fla. Supp. 2d 66 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this certiorari, we are called upon to review the decision of the City Commission, which affirmed the decision of the Zoning Board, which granted certain variances.

While the petitioners raise self-inflicted hardship and administrative res judicata, we feel it is unnecessary to reach those issues in view of the fact that the decision of the Zoning Board failed to comply with the findings requirements of Article XXXI, Section 2(d), of the City Zoning Ordinance.

Accordingly, the decision of the City Commission is quashed and the matter is remanded to the Commission and to the Zoning Board for the entry of findings as required by the Article XXXI, Section 2(d) of the City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this certiorari, we are called upon to review the decision of the City Commission, which affirmed the decision of the Zoning Board, which granted certain variances.

While the petitioners raise self-inflicted hardship and administrative res judicata, we feel it is unnecessary to reach those issues in view of the fact that the decision of the Zoning Board failed to comply with the findings requirements of Article XXXI, Section 2(d), of the City Zoning Ordinance.

Accordingly, the decision of the City Commission is quashed and the matter is remanded to the Commission and to the Zoning Board for the entry of findings as required by the Article XXXI, Section 2(d) of the City of Miami Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Fla. Supp. 2d 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hexagon-properties-v-city-of-miami-flacirct-1982.