Hewlett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hewlett v. State

111 S.E. 77, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 469

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1922

Docket12967

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 77 (Hewlett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hewlett v. State, 111 S.E. 77, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 469 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of larceny after trust. The jury credited the evidence of the State, which substantiated the allegations of the indictment. The verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The several special grounds of the motion for a new' trial are without such merit as to require a new trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new' trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of larceny after trust. The jury credited the evidence of the State, which substantiated the allegations of the indictment. The verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The several special grounds of the motion for a new' trial are without such merit as to require a new trial. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new' trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 77, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewlett-v-state-gactapp-1922.