Hewlett v. South Bound R. R.

76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 76, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 298
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 30, 1912·No. 8352·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

I think the exceptions should be overruled and the judgment affirmed. The Circuit Judge had authority to allow the amendment under sections 190, 191, 193 and 194 of the Code of Laws and under authority of Booth v. Langley, 51 S. C. 415, 29 S. E. 204; Mew v. Railway Co., 55 S. C. 99, 32 S. E. 528; Spears v. A. C. L. R. R. Co., 92 S. C. 297.

It was a matter entirely within his discretion and he did not erroneously exercise that discretion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hewlett v. South Bound R. R., 76 S.E. 32, 93 S.C. 76, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 298 (S.C. 1912).

76 S.E. 32 (Hewlett v. South Bound R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koennecke v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
85 S.E. 374 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)