Hewlett v. National Surety Corp.
This text of 254 A.D. 916 (Hewlett v. National Surety Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The trial court held that there is no substantial proof in the case which would justify a holding that the chattel mortgage was actually fraudulent, and also held the inference warranted that the chattel mortgage was in place of a chattel mortgage for the same amount, previously given by the husband to one Benjamin S. Tupper, “ which was paid or acquired.” Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 916, 6 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewlett-v-national-surety-corp-nyappdiv-1938.