Hewlett v. National Surety Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hewlett v. National Surety Corp.

254 A.D. 916, 6 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8289

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1938·Published

Opinion

— The trial court held that there is no substantial proof in the case which would justify a holding that the chattel mortgage was actually fraudulent, and also held the inference warranted that the chattel mortgage was in place of a chattel mortgage for the same amount, previously given by the husband to one Benjamin S. Tupper, “ which was paid or acquired.” Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— The trial court held that there is no substantial proof in the case which would justify a holding that the chattel mortgage was actually fraudulent, and also held the inference warranted that the chattel mortgage was in place of a chattel mortgage for the same amount, previously given by the husband to one Benjamin S. Tupper, “ which was paid or acquired.” Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Hewlett v. National Surety Corp., 254 A.D. 916, 6 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 916 (Hewlett v. National Surety Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.