Hewlett v. Moore & Moore

California Supreme Court

Hewlett v. Moore & Moore

50 Cal. 474

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1875

DocketNo. 4890

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 Cal. 474 (Hewlett v. Moore & Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hewlett v. Moore & Moore, 50 Cal. 474 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

Hoerl and the plaintiffs were tenants in common of the wool. The delivery to be made by Hoerl under either of the written agreements in evidence was merely a step looking to a division to be had between the parties according to their respective interests.

Being tenants in common neither could, under the circumstances appearing in this case, maintain replevin against the other, nor against the vendee of the other.

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

Hoerl and the plaintiffs were tenants in common of the wool. The delivery to be made by Hoerl under either of the written agreements in evidence was merely a step looking to a division to be had between the parties according to their respective interests.

Being tenants in common neither could, under the circumstances appearing in this case, maintain replevin against the other, nor against the vendee of the other.

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cal. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewlett-v-moore-moore-cal-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack