Hewlett v. Moore & Moore

California Supreme Court

Hewlett v. Moore & Moore

50 Cal. 474

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1875·No. No. 4890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

Hoerl and the plaintiffs were tenants in common of the wool. The delivery to be made by Hoerl under either of the written agreements in evidence was merely a step looking to a division to be had between the parties according to their respective interests.

Being tenants in common neither could, under the circumstances appearing in this case, maintain replevin against the other, nor against the vendee of the other.

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

Hoerl and the plaintiffs were tenants in common of the wool. The delivery to be made by Hoerl under either of the written agreements in evidence was merely a step looking to a division to be had between the parties according to their respective interests.

Being tenants in common neither could, under the circumstances appearing in this case, maintain replevin against the other, nor against the vendee of the other.

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Hewlett v. Moore & Moore, 50 Cal. 474 (Cal. 1875).

Pincite

50 Cal. 474 (Hewlett v. Moore & Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related