Hewitt's Case

3 Md. Ch. 184
High Court of Chancery of Maryland·Decided January 26, 1831·Published

Opinion

Bland, Chancellor.

Where a defendant has been found a lunatic by a regular commission, and is then in custody as such; and it is so stated, as in this instance, it is a matter of course for him to answer by his committee, without any special order for that purpose; but here it appears, that the lunatic’s committee is interested in the subject in controversy; and, therefore, it becomes necessary to appoint a disinterested, capable person as his guardian, to answer for him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hewitt's Case, 3 Md. Ch. 184 (Md. Ct. App. 1831).

3 Md. Ch. 184 (Hewitt's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Smith
4 Rand. 95 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1826)