Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Hewitt v. State

Hewitt v. State

129 S.E. 115, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 187
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16616
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 115 (Hewitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hewitt v. State, 129 S.E. 115, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Hewitt was accused and convicted of the offense of larceny after trust. The evidence did not authorize his conviction, and for this reason the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. G. 8. Glaxton, for plaintiff in error. J. Roy Rowland, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 115, 34 Ga. App. 236, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewitt-v-state-gactapp-1925.