Hewitt v. Ingham

Michigan Supreme Court

Hewitt v. Ingham

44 Mich. 153

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 44 Mich. 153 (Hewitt v. Ingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hewitt v. Ingham, 44 Mich. 153 (Mich. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Marston, C. J.

Under the proviso in 2 Comp. L. § 7427 the costs in cases heard and determined on appeal in the circuit court are under the control of the court. Although our attention has been called to several other sections supposed to have some bearing upon this question, none of them repeal, change or "affect this proviso. See also § 5459. The discretion of the court in the premises we cannot review, and as the action of the court was authorized by law, the writ must be denied with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marston, C. J.

Under the proviso in 2 Comp. L. § 7427 the costs in cases heard and determined on appeal in the circuit court are under the control of the court. Although our attention has been called to several other sections supposed to have some bearing upon this question, none of them repeal, change or "affect this proviso. See also § 5459. The discretion of the court in the premises we cannot review, and as the action of the court was authorized by law, the writ must be denied with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 Mich. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewitt-v-ingham-mich-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack