Hewitt
This text of 196 Ct. Cl. 774 (Hewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Military fay; retired fay (disability) ; rank for retirement purposes; determination by Secretary of highest grade satisfactorily held.- — -Plaintiff, an enlisted man in the Air Force (formerly Army), was promoted in 1944 from private to the temporary rank of master sergeant as a student assigned to the Emergency Rescue School, which position he held for one month, the school being deactivated; whereupon he was reduced to private. He was successively promoted to staff sergeant, being placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List for physical disability in 1969. In 1969 the Secretary of the service determined that the highest grade plaintiff satisfactorily held was staff sergeant and he was retired in that grade on January 1, 1970. Upon denial by the Correction Board of his application to show retirement in the grade of master sergeant, he filed suit in this court seeking retirement pay in the grade of master sergeant. This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff’s petition fails to state a claim for relief.- (See Roberts v. [775]*775United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 360, 364-65 (1960). On October 29, 1971, by order, the court denied plaintiff’s motion, granted defendant’s motion, and dismissed the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 Ct. Cl. 774, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 31, 1971 WL 4155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewitt-cc-1971.