HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK

District Court of Appeal of Florida

HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 8, 2021

Docket20-1643

StatusPublished

This text of HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK (HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

HEWITT A. GRANT, II,

Appellant,

v.

GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D., and, ROBERT MITCHELL MACK, PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE,

Appellees.

No. 2D20-1643

September 8, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Ellen S. Masters, Judge.

Hewitt A. Grant, II, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI