Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK

HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 2021·No. 20-1643·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

HEWITT A. GRANT, II,

Appellant,

v.

GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D., and, ROBERT MITCHELL MACK, PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE,

Appellees.

No. 2D20-1643

September 8, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Ellen S. Masters, Judge.

Hewitt A. Grant, II, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK (HEWITT A. GRANT, I I v. GUY DAVID BRADSTOCK, A.P.D. , AND ROBERT MITCHELL MACK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.